\u0026lt;\u0026lt;Common: fighting tax evasion and money who takes>>
"Federalism will not bring charges in more business."
 |
| Luca Antonini |
Professor, national small and medium businesses, however, have data that they fear more withdrawals against them with the municipal federalism.
To increase taxes would be just two lines: if you make eight enactment means that things are different. The truth is that you go to rationalize a system that had gone out of control, and this can not come further withdrawals. More taxes you pay today, with the current system where the citizen pays, but does not know where the money should be spent, and there are regional entities with absurd charges that have gone out of control. Catania had € 140 million of outstanding contribution of the Government and then he was also awarded for the implementation of the Stability means that the system must be radically corrected. The decrees fight wasteful spending in favor of a transparent and rational that will lead to lower taxes.
So the Veneto be reassured.
Yes because it will reward the virtuous community and penalize those who waste, mainly due to a redistribution of resources with an indication of the "standard requirements" of the various services. Today Naples takes "per capita" resources than twice those of Treviso and Vicenza, with no rational explanation. The "standard requirements" will correct this situation out of control. For this will reduce the pressure: the IMU at a rate fixed at 0.76 per cent tax will generate savings because the income tax on income also includes land. Each mayor will then reduce the IMU for businesses, up to half the current ICI.
What changes will snap this year with the Municipal Ordinance of Federalism? There is a coupon
dry on rents that is immediately operational. There is the cost of transfer to municipalities of the Self: Part of 2011 and eliminates the current transfers. It also must be added together to sharing some of the contributions / fees on real estate. And there's a third of the "standard requirements" that will be applied as early as 2012 because figures are precisely defined in 2011. And then there's the competition of the City for recovery of tax evasion: Municipalities on property forfeit 50% of revenues are now, without waiting for recovery is to be enforceable. In Emilia Romagna there is already a rule with a recovery of 30% gave results, with interesting proposals as constituting the proceeds of evasion of funds for aid to companies that have laid off or take.
The "standard requirements" are defined by the company Sose: you check your work?
Yes, it is the committee that will evaluate all standardization Copaff made.
Now you'll vote for the federal and regional governments: in Rome feels the same tense of the municipal?
Maybe it's a bit 'better, but this week you will understand. In my opinion some of the PD proposals are likely to have a heavy impact on public finances and therefore unlikely to be accepted. On others you can come meet.
has some theme in mind?
In terms of standard requirements on social dialogue is possible. Even on the Conference for the coordination of public finance: the proposal is to anticipate, and probably will be accepted.
Health: came out to surprise the standard cost data that will help the South
No, indeed. Today is the big hole on waste: there are about 5 billion deficit in some regions of the South will be identified as waste and not as health needs: it is a revolution. Then it will work much on the indicators of reference prices: it can no longer be a cost-tac twice in one region over another.
From "Il Giornale di Vicenza" of 15/03/11 EP
0 comments:
Post a Comment